I chose to read the article, “Independent Child Migration and Education in Ghana” because of the service learning project at Hope Community Boys’ Home. In speaking with PhD student, Rosie, who lived at Hope for 3 weeks, I learned that one young man she met had migrated to Accra to serve as a ‘house boy’. It sounded like he had a poor experience and moved into Hope as a result. I wanted to learn more about children’s migration experiences and the accompanying opportunities and disadvantages.
In the article, Iman Hashim interviewed young people who had independently migrated from rural farms of Northeastern Ghana to rural and urban areas of Central and Southern Ghana. He describes connections between migration and access to formal and non-formal education.
Firstly, education in Ghana is made up of nine years of free, compulsory, basic education. Students can go on to senior secondary schools for a fee, if they qualify through examinations. School fees vary, but are considered expensive, especially for those with low income. Hashim states that one factor in a child’s enrollment in school is the family’s perceived benefit of securing well-being for the household. He writes that a senior secondary school certificate is mostly necessary to obtain formal job. A family must believe that a child will succeed and contribute to the household, since the family is investing so much in the education.
Hashim goes on to describe Northeastern Ghanaian families in intensive farming villages. Some families determine that work is more appropriate than formal education for their child (and is also seen as age-appropriate behavior for children). Hashim states that although there is need for a child to contribute labor and to teach them skills for adulthood, labor is also a process of enculturation into roles in the domestic economy and wider community. Furthermore, children are usually included in conversations about their migration. Younger children (7-13) are usually sent at the request for labor from a migrant relative, or to be cared for elsewhere. Older children (13-18) often choose to seek opportunities to maximize their welfare and livelihood, by moving elsewhere.
While some children may migrate for educational opportunity, there were negative outcomes, which include the risk of exposure to abusive and exploitative working conditions. Also, Hashim describes a trend in which children migrated to fill a labor void in a relative’s household. The filled labor gap allowed the relative’s children to fulfill their own educational aspirations.
Hashim’s research states that some positive aspects of migration are related to educational and training opportunities. Migration may allow a child to earn money to pay for school or an apprenticeship. Children may also be afforded support for going to school in exchange for the labor.
He states that a range of factors impact on the linkages between children’s independent migration and education, and the effects of migration on education are very context-specific. Migration may offer a greater opportunity for education for some, while others leave school in order to migrate for work.
This article has compelled me to consider the differences in concepts of education versus work and how these ideas vary between the U.S. and Ghana. The U.S. has laws which protect children from work through child labor laws. In order to understand this concept in Ghanaian culture, the next article I will review will be “New Laws, Old Values: Indigenous Resistance to Children’s Rights in Ghana” by Janice Windborne.
Reference
Hashim, Iman. (2007). Independent child migration and education in Ghana.
Development and Change. 38(5): 911–931.